Emerge!That!Modern!
Growing New Organs

The topic of kidney regeneration came up in class today, so I did a little digging. Here is a recent TED talk by Dr. Anthony Atala on current research on regenerative tissues. It’s a fascinating talk, moving at the end, and raises an important point around the 16:15 mark: current medical research is ultimately guided by the Hippocratic Oath. So, where Shelley warns us about runaway science resulting in monstrous creations that escape our control, modern scientific inquiry (at least in medicine) is guided by a code of ethics.

Here’s a link, in case my attempt at embedding the video fails.

The Kidney.

Here you can find more of these amazing creatures!
Do these terrify you?  Mostly, they just amuse me.

Here you can find more of these amazing creatures!

Do these terrify you?  Mostly, they just amuse me.

Arraignment of the Men

Yandra sent me this poem, to make a connection to Maria.   I hope you all enjoy it!

Sister Juana Inés de la Cruz
(1651-1691)


Arraignment of the Men


Males perverse, schooled to condemn
    Women by your witless laws,
    Though forsooth you are prime cause
Of that which you blame in them:

If with unexampled care
    You solicit their disdain,
    Will your fair words ease their pain, 
When you ruthless set the snare?

Their resistance you impugn,
    Then maintain with gravity
    That it was mere levity
Made you dare to importune.

    .    .    .    .    .    .    .    .

What more elevating sight
    Than of man with logic crass,
    Who with hot breath fogs the glass,
Then laments it is not bright!

Scorn and favor, favor, scorn,
    What you will, result the same,
    Treat you ill, and earn your blame,
Love you well, be left forlorn.

Scant regard will she possess
    Who with caution wends her way,—
    Is held thankless for her “nay,”
And as wanton for her “yes.”

    .    .    .    .    .    .    .    .

What must be the rare caprice
    Of the quarry you engage:
    If she flees, she wakes your rage,
If she yields, her charms surcease.

    .    .    .    .    .    .    .    .

Who shall bear the heavier blame, 
    When remorse the twain enthralls, 
    She, who for the asking, falls,
He who, asking, brings to shame?

Whose the guilt, where to begin,
    Though both yield to passion’s sway, 
    She who weakly sins for pay,
He who, strong, yet pays for Sin?

Then why stare ye, if we prove
    That the guilt lies at your gate?
    Either love those you create,
Or create those you can love.

To solicitation truce,— 
    Then, sire, with some show of right
    You may mock the hapless plight
Or the creatures of your use!


                —Peter H. Goldsmith (translator)

This is rather funny, but accurate, so if you want a quick intro before Tuesday, you should watch this in your spare time!  What’s better to do on a weekend?

Thoughts on IBM’s Watson vs. Humans

Ken Jennings’ account of the experience is a great read:

http://www.slate.com/id/2284721/

Jennings jokes at the end about Watson becoming sentient: build a big enough, thoughtful enough computer, and it just might become self-aware.  The prospect of sentient machines calls into question what it means to be human (again, the stuff of sci-fi), but the disappearance of “our beloved intelligence” is a reality that long precedes Watson and his natural language processing.  Instant access to information has lessened our need to retain anything.  Why should I commit a fact to memory when I can type three words into Google and have the definitive answer (and then some) delivered to me?  More room in my brain for Lady Gaga lyrics!

Take Jeopardy! as an example.  Didn’t it used to be much harder?  Or maybe I just knew considerably less as a child, and my whole argument is wrong.

IBM’s Watson vs Humans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLdkJpAtt1I&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

I thought this was interesting because of the popular views on A.I. We’ve only “scratched the surface” of human thought and knowledge with this experiment says one of the leaders on this project.

This stuff has been imagined in sci-fi for decades now. Does this instill a sense of fear of what’s to come? Is our beloved intelligence on the line? This is what Jon Stewart had to say:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-february-16-2011/intro—-watson-competes-on-jeopardy

Thoughts?

I accept chaos. I am not sure whether it accepts me. I know some people are terrified of the bomb. But then some people are terrified to be seen carrying a modern screen magazine. Experience teaches us that silence terrifies people the most.
Bob Dylan (via englishness)
My boss made this and I think it describes postmodernism fairly well. So to keep track.
The Modern — a new thought / idea (of that time)
Post-Modern(ism) — newer thoughts / ideas (post WW2 - now)
Modernism — a movement.  One we will only lightly tough on in the books we read (Mrs. Dalloway!)

Oh, and The Myth of Sisyphus — a must read!  No extra credit on this one, but there’s some for the Foucault I sent through email.  Bringing modernism into the modern!
Modernity — check this out
Contemporary — now. like, this second. there it goes. oh, it’s back.
Be sure to keep these concepts separate when I speak of “the modern” or “modern thought” or “modernity”.  & it is all about knowing something we did not know that now gives us new ways of thinking.

My boss made this and I think it describes postmodernism fairly well. So to keep track.

The Modern — a new thought / idea (of that time)

Post-Modern(ism) — newer thoughts / ideas (post WW2 - now)

Modernism — a movement.  One we will only lightly tough on in the books we read (Mrs. Dalloway!)

Oh, and The Myth of Sisyphus — a must read!  No extra credit on this one, but there’s some for the Foucault I sent through email.  Bringing modernism into the modern!

Modernity — check this out

Contemporary — now. like, this second. there it goes. oh, it’s back.

Be sure to keep these concepts separate when I speak of “the modern” or “modern thought” or “modernity”.  & it is all about knowing something we did not know that now gives us new ways of thinking.

Just a little bit of lightness before I bring on some doom & gloom, because hey, Hamlet is kind of a gloomy guy and it isn’t like they had anti-depressants back then.

Just a little bit of lightness before I bring on some doom & gloom, because hey, Hamlet is kind of a gloomy guy and it isn’t like they had anti-depressants back then.